Judge or jury: Who should resentence juvenile lifers?

Judge or jury: Who should resentence juvenile lifers?

The 2012 Supreme Court decision in Miller v. Alabama held that mandatory sentences of life without parole for juveniles were unconstitutional.

The court’s 2016 decision in Montgomery v. Louisiana said the Miller decision was retroactive, meaning that everyone sentenced to life without parole as a juvenile is entitled to have their sentences reconsidered.

The next legal question for juvenile lifers that could potentially come from the United States Supreme Court is whether a jury or judge should be the one to consider and impose the new sentences.

CONTINUE READING on michiganradio.org

Juvenile Justice // Stop Solitary For Kids

Juvenile Justice // Stop Solitary For Kids

Moving Police Officers From Enforcers to Protectors

Moving Police Officers From Enforcers to Protectors